000			01858nab a22002297ab4500
003			NY
005			20170510095445.0
007			cr |||||n|||||
008			160401p xxu|||||o|||||00| 0 eng||
040			_aNY _cNY
041	0		_jeng
100	1		_aLarkin, Mary.
245	1	0	_aCarers, choice and personalisation _h[electronic resource] : _bwhat do we know? / _cMary Larkin, Wendy Mitchell.
300			_app. 189-205.
520			_aDespite the long-term strategic shift to personalisation, with its emphasis on choice and control for those who use public services, there has been relatively little policy consideration of family carers’ choice within personalisation. The relationship between carers and personalisation also remains under-researched. This article is based on a review of existing knowledge around personalisation. It shows that carer choice is highly complex, not least because of the multifaceted and paradoxical nature of the concept of choice itself. The review demonstrates that choice for carers within personalisation is no less complex and is subject to new and overlapping variables which do not necessarily lead to improved choice for carers. In light of the limited empirical evidence about carers, choice and personalisation, the introduction of the Care Act 2014, and the importance of frontline practice in securing choice for carers, recommendations are made for future research and social work policy and practice.
538			_aMode of access: Internet.
653			_aChoice, carers, carer choice, personalisation, adult social care
700	1		_aMitchell, Wendy.
773	0		_tSocial policy and society. _g2016, Vol. 15, No. 2 _x1474-7464 _wocm49954477
856	4	0	_uhttp://ezproxy01.ny.edu.hk:2048/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746415000299 _zClick here to access full-text article
942			_2lcc _cE-ARTICLE
999			_c18493 _d18493