000			01899nab a22002177ab4500
003			NY
005			20170510135703.0
007			cr |||||n|||||
008			161001p xxu|||||o|||||00| 0 eng||
040			_aNY _cNY
041	0		_jeng
100	1		_aPrady, Stephanie L.
245	1	0	_aDoes administrative data reflect individual experience? _h[electronic resource] : _bcomparing an index of poverty with individually collected data on financial well-being in a multi-ethnic community / _cStephanie L. Prady [et. al.].
300			_app. 513-533.
520			_aThe Income Deprivation Affecting Children Index (IDACI) uses administrative data to count children living in households in receipt of both in-work and out-of-work means-tested benefits and provides small area ranking as an indicator of child poverty in neighbourhoods. Benefit take-up rates within an area will affect its reliability. We aimed to examine benefit take-up rates and compare area ranking by the IDACI with ranking using individually reported data across areas of varying ethnic composition. Mothers living in areas with high minority ethnic density were less likely to report claiming a benefit than those in majority White or mixed areas, despite reporting lower incomes. The correlation between self-reported material difficulties and worsening IDACI rank was much lower in areas characterised by minority ethnic populations. Further investigation into the performance of area-based deprivation measures in areas with high minority ethnic density is needed.
538			_aMode of access: Internet.
653			_aChild poverty, IDACI, Benefit claimants, Ethnic minority
773	0		_tSocial policy and society. _g2016, Vol. 15, No. 4 _x1474-7464 _wocm49954477
856	4	0	_uhttp://ezproxy01.ny.edu.hk:2048/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746415000597 _zClick here to access full-text article
942			_2lcc _cE-ARTICLE
999			_c18519 _d18519