| 000 | 01949nab a22002417ab4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | NY | ||
| 005 | 20170510143208.0 | ||
| 007 | cr |||||n||||| | ||
| 008 | 170401p xxu|||||o|||||00| 0 eng|| | ||
| 040 |
_aNY _cNY |
||
| 041 | 0 | _jeng | |
| 100 | 1 | _aEdmiston, Daniel. | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 |
_aAusterity, welfare and social citizenship _h[electronic resource] / _cDaniel Edmiston, Ruth Patrick, Kayleigh Garthwaite. |
| 300 | _app. 253-259. | ||
| 440 | 0 | _aThemed section on austerity, welfare and social citizenship | |
| 520 | _aSince the global financial crisis in 2008, an ‘austerity consensus’ has emerged across many advanced capitalist economies (Farnsworth and Irving, 2012). Despite differing institutional settings, there has been a notable degree of convergence on fiscal consolidation (Farnsworth and Irving, 2012; Taylor-Gooby, 2012). Alongside this, political administrations have repeatedly claimed that welfare profligacy and dependency are key causes of public sector debt and economic stagnation. On this basis, political leaders have cultivated a policy mandate to re-configure working-age welfare and constrain public social expenditure in this domain. Taken together, these reforms represent a ‘new, more constrained and qualitatively different deal for citizens’ (Dwyer and Wright, 2014: 33). The central objective of this themed section is to explore the impact of these developments and their significance for the shifting character and operation of social citizenship in countries pursuing a similar strategy of ‘welfare austerity’ (MacLeavy, 2011: 360). | ||
| 538 | _aMode of access: Internet. | ||
| 700 | 1 | _aPatrick, Ruth. | |
| 700 | 1 | _aGarthwaite, Kayleigh. | |
| 773 | 0 |
_tSocial policy and society. _g2017, Vol. 16, No. 2 _x1474-7464 _wocm49954477 |
|
| 856 | 4 | 0 |
_uhttp://ezproxy01.ny.edu.hk:2048/login?url=https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746416000658 _zClick here to access full-text article |
| 942 |
_2lcc _cE-ARTICLE |
||
| 999 |
_c18550 _d18550 |
||